Selective or non-selective?
The advantages and disadvantages of selective and non-selective events were explored.
Commitment
The most important feature for participating artists is their level of commitment to the event – characterised, for example, by their ability to get their details and images in by the deadline, opening their studios at the advertised times, and offeing a quality experience to visitors. Their level of commitment can be raised through good briefings and advice in advance of the event, and a thorough evaluation at the end.
Quality of ‘whole event'
quality control is about the whole event and not just about selecting artists. Quality control should come at all levels: the management team, design and promotion, pride and ownership by artists and event organisers, presentation of the whole event, how the event is evaluated and developed. Then the event will naturally attract a better more professional body of artists, quality audience, quality media coverage, sales and opportunities for the participating artists.
Quality control could also be directed by the event through its core aims; encouraging events and opportunities for new graduates, conceptual artists and international artists, will influence the event's structure. Events aimed at commercial artists and designer-makers, that create opportunities through professional development, are more likely to attract professional quality participants.
The more professional an event is perceived and organised, the more attractive it becomes to professional artists.
The organisation and ethos of the event can raise the quality of participating artists by:
Drafting contracts of commitment
insisting on attendance at briefings and participation in evaluation exercises
providing standards for images to be used in publicity material
offering advice and guidelines as well as CPD opportunities
encouraging them to offer the best quality of experience to visitors |